Interest is surging in tiny houses – livable living units usually measure underneath four hundred rectangular toes (37 rectangular meters). Much of this interest is pushed by media insurance claiming that dwelling in tiny houses is good for the planet. It may additionally seem intuitively apparent that downsizing to a tiny home would reduce one’s environmental effect since its method occupies a much smaller area and consumes fewer assets.
But little research has been achieved to, without a doubt, measure how human beings’ environmental behaviors exchange once they make this drastic flow. For my doctorate in ecological design and making plans, I sought to fill this knowledge gap by developing a look that might provide measurable evidence on how downsizing affects environmental influences. First, I surveyed 80 downsizers who had lived in tiny houses for a year or more to calculate their ecological footprints in prior housing and the present-day environmental footprints of their small homes. Then, I performed nine in-depth interviews to discover behaviors that changed after downsizing.
I found that ecological footprints decreased by about forty-five percent among eighty tiny domestic downsizers across the United States on average. Surprisingly, I determined that downsizing can influence many elements of 1’s lifestyle and reduce environmental impacts in surprising methods.
In recent decades, the construction fashion has been to “move big”. Newly constructed homes inside the United States typically have a more significant average rectangular footage than in other United States worldwide.
